American Crappy Plane Crashes (1)
American Airlines Flight 96 was a regular McDonnell Douglas DC-10-10 commuter flight operated by American Airlines, with a scheduled route from Detroit, Michigan to Buffalo, New York.The flight suffered explosive decompression, due to cargo door failure, on 12 June 1972 while flying over Windsor, Ontario; it is thus sometimes referred to as the Windsor incident.[1] The failure of the cargo door caused the partial collapse of the passenger compartment floor. The sagging floor ruptured some hydraulic lines, pulled the rudder control cable to its maximum left position, and severed controls to engine number two leading to serious problems operating the aircraft.[2] The plane had no rudder power, and little responsiveness in the elevators or ailerons. However the crew, led by Captain Bryce McCormick, were able to apply differential thrust in the DC-10's wing engines to turn the aircraft, and use what elevator control they had to maintain vertical stabilization. It happened that while converting to the DC-10, McCormick had practiced in a simulator controlling the plane in this fashion, in the worst-case scenario of a hydraulic failure.[1] A similar technique was used in 1989 following a complete loss of hydraulic pressure on another DC-10, United Airlines Flight 232.Despite the aircraft's being severely damaged, the crew made a successful emergency landing at Detroit, and all people on board evacuated safely. The incident highlighted a serious design flaw in the cargo doors of DC-10 aircraft whereby the door could appear closed but be ineffectively latched.[3] The fault was not satisfactorily repaired, and a subsequent cargo door blow-out occurred in another DC-10 two years later, on Turkish Airlines Flight 981, killing all 346 on board. At the time, the Turkish Airlines accident was the deadliest aviation disaster in history.Many commentators subsequently blamed the aircraft manufacturer, McDonnell Douglas, and other aviation authorities, for failing to learn lessons from the Flight 96 incident. Although there had been some redesign of the DC-10 cargo door system, it had only been implemented voluntarily and haphazardly by various airlines. If the warning signs of Flight 96 had been heeded, the Turkish Airlines disaster might have been avoided.Istanbul that morning, landing at Paris's Orly International Airport just after 11:00 AM local time. The aircraft, a McDonnell Douglas DC-10, was carrying just 167 passengers and 13 crew members in its first leg. 50 passengers disembarked to Paris. The flight's second leg, from Paris to London's Heathrow Airport, was normally underbooked, but owing to a strike by British Airways employees, many London-bound travelers who had been stranded at Orly were booked onto Flight 981. There were 17 English rugby players who had attended a France-England match the previous day; the flight also carried four British fashion models, 48 Japanese bank management trainees on their way to England, as well as passengers from a dozen other countries.The aircraft departed Orly at around 12:30 PM for its flight to Heathrow. It took off in an easterly direction, then turned to the north to avoid flying directly over Paris. Just after Flight 981 passed over the town of Meaux, controllers picked up a distorted transmission from Flight 981; the aircraft's pressurization and overspeed warnings were heard over the pilots' words in Turkish, including the co-pilot saying "the fuselage has burst." The flight disappeared from radar shortly thereafter, and its wreckage was later found at the Grove of Dammartin in the Ermenonville forest, close to the town of Senlis.
Channel: Science & Technology
Uploaded: December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm
Author: justclimb911
Length: 10:18
Rating: 5.00
Views: 18672
Tags: 747 777 787 96 981 Airlines American crap Crappy Crash dc-10 Flight max mosley Planes sex Turkish Turquish video
Video Comments
|
n310ea (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
L-1011's were safer than DC-10's, they should have used them.
uploader1010 (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
airbus is much better
uploader1010 (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
Airbus is much safer that Boeing.
justclimb911 (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
Fatal Crash Rate per 1.000.000 Flights.Boeing 727** 0.49Boeing 737 0.47*Boeing 747 0.76 Boeing 757** 0.30 Boeing 767 0.40 Boeing 777 0.00 Boeing DC9** 0.57 Boeing DC10** 0.67 Boeing MD11** 0.56 Boeing MD80/MD90 0.26I know Boeing has a SAFETY "problem" indeed.*The B737 responsible for the latest 3 deadly crashes with about 300 people{s lives killed.
justclimb911 (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
The 777 is a nice safe plane...wait for the 787...stats are related with PAST accidents.The latest 3 comercial plane crashes have ONE COMMON CAUSE: The Boeing 737, 300 people killed in just one month: SEPTEMBER 2008.Rates might be disturbing...but they reflect perfectly the SAFETY REALITY in a gross manner.
Vikkoman (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
So, Justclimb, in 2008, what does Boeing do differently that Airbus or the Russian aircraft makers do not do.Of course product design problems plagued the DC-10 (the cargo door, later fixed in redesign), the 737 (the rudder, later fixed in redesign), the 747 Combi (the fire suppression capabilities of the cargo area), and the MD-80 (jackscrew). But nowadays pilot error is the main reason for crashes. Product design failure doesn't seem to be a factor anymore.
justclimb911 (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
Common sense is widely welcomed in this space.Said that, New Technology has to pass same quality controls as any other techology...design problems are common in the development process of any new product, what is being disscused here, is why preciselly just American Crap is the main subject of ALL of the Plane Crashes where technical reasons are envolved...Nice coincidence...isn“t it?
bg11215 (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
It was the dawn of commercial jet aviation, when these airplanes were first being produced. As with any new product, some issues are bound to arise. It doesn't mean there was any intentional negligence i.e. criminal activity. It simply means that no one had any way to know because it was so new. That's why the technology continues to develop ad planes get better and better.
bg11215 (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
It's true that the DC-10 had a couple of problems with the rudder which caused catastrophe, but so has the Boeing 737.
Vikkoman (December 31, 1969 at 3:59 pm)
Then McDonnell Douglas had poorly-designed aircraft in the 1970s. They are gone, though, so while we have to learn from this incident, we don't have to worry about this particular company screwing up anymore. |
|